This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 238 complaints

Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 29 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
Subscribe to complaint changes (RSS)

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record rausch-sturm-israel-enerson-hornik-llp Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP

Grade D · 238 CFPB filings · 97% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #468 · compose #96

  • VOL 238
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 29
  • TIMELY 97%
  • DISPUTE 14%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #468
  • COMPOSE #96

Volume peers

Nearest volume peer: BlueChip Financial (238 complaints)

BlueChip FinancialBlueChip Financial238Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP (this)Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Eners…238Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.à r.l.Altisource Portfolio Solutio…239Aqua Finance, Inc.Aqua Finance, Inc.239Healthcare Finance Direct LLC.Healthcare Finance Direct LL…239
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP's 238 CFPB complaints sit next to BlueChip Financial on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

How the 238 complaints break down

Every complaint issue type on record for Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP, not just the top ones shown above.

Reputation score breakdown

D
Composite reputation score
55.7/100
Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP

Blends complaint volume, timely-response rate, dispute rate, and recent trend from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database into one comparable 0-100 score. Not an official CFPB rating and not a finding of wrongdoing — see methodology for the exact formula.

Complaint volume F
238
Fewer complaints relative to graded peers scores higher; volume reflects footprint as much as conduct.
Timely response A
97%
Share of complaints answered inside the CFPB’s 15-day window.
Dispute rate A
14%
Share of company responses the consumer disputed as inadequate; lower is better.
Recent trend B
Falling
Whether the last 12 months of complaints are rising, stable, or falling vs the prior period.

Spiky monthly series

Texas is the plurality state for Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP (28.2%)

Peak share is this collector's company_monthly maximum divided by its own stored monthly total. Corpus placement method.

Plurality state
Texas 28.2%
Mid-band (15–30%) · 29 states with ≥1 filing
Spike month
2026-01 15.0%
3 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Corpus ranks
#468 volume
#96 composite
Among 5,420 volume-ranked / 536 scored collectors with 200+ complaints

How does Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP compare to its peers?

How does Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
16
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
97%
99%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
14%
11%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Response speed vs. dispute rate, among similar-volume collectors

Timely response and dispute rate track only weakly together nationally (r=0.22 among collectors with 5+ complaints): answering promptly does not reliably buy Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP a lower dispute rate.

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Timely response rate (%) (X) and Dispute rate (%) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Responsive but disputedSlow & disputedResponsive & trustedSlow but undisputed 75%80%85%90%95%100%105% 0%10%20%30%40%50% Timely response rate (%) Dispute rate (%) Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP vs. 8 similar-volume peers, by response speed and dispute rate Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLPBlueChip FinancialBB&T CORPORATIONRGS Financial, Inc.Aqua Finance, Inc.Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.à r.l.BYL Collection ServicesM.A.R.S., Inc.Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc.
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP's complaint volume in context

Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP vs all collectors by complaint volume

Where this collector's total CFPB complaint count sits among every tracked debt collector (volume, not a quality ranking)

238 Top 9% higher than 91% of 5,420 collectors

0–20: 3,504 collectors (65%). Below this entry. 20–40: 565 collectors (10%). Below this entry. 40–60: 260 collectors (5%). Below this entry. 60–80: 163 collectors (3%). Below this entry. 80–100: 112 collectors (2%). Below this entry. 100–120: 63 collectors (1%). Below this entry. 120–140: 67 collectors (1%). Below this entry. 140–160: 53 collectors (1%). Below this entry. 160–180: 42 collectors (1%). Below this entry. 180–200: 55 collectors (1%). Below this entry. 200–220: 536 collectors (10%). This entry sits in this band. Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP 0 220 tracked debt collectors, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more collectors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database · September 2026

Complaint Trend (24 months)

Falling ↓
2023-10 2026-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed
55
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
47
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
30
Written notification about debt
26
Communication tactics
25
False statements or representation
19
Disclosure verification of debt
16
Taking/threatening an illegal action
11
Improper contact or sharing of info
7
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly
2

Where do complaints against Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP come from?

Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP

Across 29 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Similar filing volume

Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 238.

4 peers

Similar timely response rate

Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 97.47899159663865%.

4 peers

Know your rights before responding to Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.