This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Integrated Recovery Services - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 41 states, reputation grade F.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Integrated Recovery Services
- Communication tactics
Communication tactics
68 complaints
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
Taking/threatening an illegal action
30 complaints
- Improper contact or sharing of info 26
Improper contact or sharing of info
26 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 20
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
20 complaints
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 17
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
17 complaints
- False statements or representation 16
False statements or representation
16 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record integrated-recovery-services Integrated Recovery Services
Grade F · 194 CFPB filings · 29% timely · lead issue: Communication tactics · vol #553 · compose #5176
- VOL 194
- GRADE F
- 12MO 0
- STATES 41
- TIMELY 29%
- DISPUTE 11%
- ISSUE Communication tactics
- RANK #553
- COMPOSE #5,176
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: 2288984 Ontario Inc. (195 complaints)
Integrated Recovery Services's 194 CFPB complaints sit next to 2288984 Ontario Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Filing geometry
Texas is the plurality state for Integrated Recovery Services (17.0%)
Volume rank #553 and composite rank #5,176 diverge by 4,623 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.
- Plurality state
- Texas 17.0%
- Mid-band (15–30%) · 41 states with ≥1 filing
- Seasonal peak
- 2020-11 11.8%
- 8–15% band · 4 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #553 volume
- #5,176 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 4,623 places worse than volume
How does Integrated Recovery Services compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Communication tactics | 68 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 30 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 26 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 20 |
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 17 |
| False statements or representation | 16 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 11 |
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 3 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 2 |
| Written notification about debt | 1 |
Where do complaints against Integrated Recovery Services come from?
Integrated Recovery Services's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Integrated Recovery Services
Across 41 states with at least one filing
- Texas
Texas
33 complaints
- California
California
31 complaints
- Ohio
Ohio
19 complaints
- Florida 13
Florida
13 complaints
- Michigan 8
Michigan
8 complaints
- New Jersey 8
New Jersey
8 complaints
- Nevada 6
Nevada
6 complaints
- Arizona 5
Arizona
5 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Integrated Recovery Services: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 194.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 29.230769230769234%.
Know your rights before responding to Integrated Recovery Services: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |