This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 61 complaints

Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 4 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record zarzaur-and-schwartz-pc Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC

Grade D · 61 CFPB filings · 93% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #1082 · compose #3252

  • VOL 61
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 10
  • STATES 4
  • TIMELY 93%
  • DISPUTE 25%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #1,082
  • COMPOSE #3,252

Nearest volume peer: Apothaker & Associates, PC (61 complaints)

Apothaker & Associates, PC61Atlas Credit Company, Inc.61Biehl & Biehl, Inc61BSI Financial Holdings, Inc.61Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC (th…61
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC's 61 CFPB complaints sit next to Apothaker & Associates, PC on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

86.9% of Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC's CFPB filings land in Alabama

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC is volume #1,082 but composite #3,252, while Alabama dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Alabama 86.9%
53 of 61 filings · 4 states touched
Seasonal peak
2025-09 13.2%
8–15% band · 5 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,082 volume
#3,252 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,170 places worse than volume

How does Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC compare to its peers?

How does Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Zarzaur and Schwartz, … National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
10
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
93%
98%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
25%
48%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2018-08 2026-02

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 22
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 15
Written notification about debt 14
Disclosure verification of debt 3
False statements or representation 2
Communication tactics 2
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 1
Improper contact or sharing of info 1
Taking/threatening an illegal action 1

Where do complaints against Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC come from?

Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC

Across 4 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Zarzaur and Schwartz, PC: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.