This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Midwest Recovery Systems - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 48 states, reputation grade F.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Midwest Recovery Systems
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
622 complaints
- Written notification about debt
Written notification about debt
405 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 185
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
185 complaints
- Disclosure verification of debt 94
Disclosure verification of debt
94 complaints
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 83
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
83 complaints
- False statements or representation 83
False statements or representation
83 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record midwest-recovery-systems Midwest Recovery Systems
Grade F · 1,541 CFPB filings · 83% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #119 · compose #4357
- VOL 1,541
- GRADE F
- 12MO 0
- STATES 48
- TIMELY 83%
- DISPUTE 16%
- ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
- RANK #119
- COMPOSE #4,357
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Expert Global Solutions, Inc. (1,548 complaints)
Midwest Recovery Systems's 1,541 CFPB complaints sit next to Expert Global Solutions, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Filing geometry
Texas is the plurality state for Midwest Recovery Systems (20.7%)
Volume rank #119 and composite rank #4,357 diverge by 4,238 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.
- Plurality state
- Texas 20.7%
- Mid-band (15–30%) · 48 states with ≥1 filing
- Seasonal peak
- 2025-12 9.1%
- 8–15% band · 24 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #119 volume
- #4,357 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 4,238 places worse than volume
How does Midwest Recovery Systems compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 622 |
| Written notification about debt | 405 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 185 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 94 |
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 83 |
| False statements or representation | 83 |
| Communication tactics | 43 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 11 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 8 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 7 |
Where do complaints against Midwest Recovery Systems come from?
Midwest Recovery Systems's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Midwest Recovery Systems
Across 48 states with at least one filing
- Texas
Texas
319 complaints
- Florida
Florida
168 complaints
- California
California
157 complaints
- Ohio 74
Ohio
74 complaints
- Georgia 65
Georgia
65 complaints
- Michigan 54
Michigan
54 complaints
- Pennsylvania 53
Pennsylvania
53 complaints
- Louisiana 49
Louisiana
49 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Midwest Recovery Systems: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 1,541.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 83.12783906554185%.
Know your rights before responding to Midwest Recovery Systems: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |