This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 30 complaints

Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 3 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record jenkins-wagnon-young-pc Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.

Grade D · 30 CFPB filings · 97% timely · lead issue: Written notification about debt · vol #1539 · compose #3835

  • VOL 30
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 2
  • STATES 3
  • TIMELY 97%
  • DISPUTE 56%
  • ISSUE Written notification about…
  • RANK #1,539
  • COMPOSE #3,835

Nearest volume peer: Atlantic Collection Agency, Inc. (30 complaints)

Atlantic Collection Agency, …30Capital Recovery Corporation30Collection at Law, Inc. A.P.…30Credit One LLC30Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C…30
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.'s 30 CFPB complaints sit next to Atlantic Collection Agency, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

93.3% of Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.'s CFPB filings land in Texas

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C. is volume #1,539 but composite #3,835, while Texas dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Texas 93.3%
28 of 30 filings · 3 states touched
Seasonal peak
2013-11 8.3%
8–15% band · 1 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,539 volume
#3,835 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,296 places worse than volume

How does Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C. compare to its peers?

How does Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Jenkins, Wagnon & Youn… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
2
3
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
97%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
56%
18%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2013-11 2025-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Written notification about debt 7
False statements or representation 7
Attempts to collect debt not owed 5
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 4
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 4
Communication tactics 2
Taking/threatening an illegal action 1

Where do complaints against Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C. come from?

Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.

Across 3 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Jenkins, Wagnon & Young, P.C.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.