This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
CURO Intermediate Holdings - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 45 states, reputation grade D.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about CURO Intermediate Holdings
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
734 complaints
- Written notification about debt
Written notification about debt
294 complaints
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 196
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
196 complaints
- False statements or representation 161
False statements or representation
161 complaints
- Communication tactics 108
Communication tactics
108 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 102
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
102 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record curo-intermediate-holdings CURO Intermediate Holdings
Grade D · 1,693 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #106 · compose #3561
- VOL 1,693
- GRADE D
- 12MO 31
- STATES 45
- TIMELY 100%
- DISPUTE 15%
- ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
- RANK #106
- COMPOSE #3,561
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC (1,693 complaints)
CURO Intermediate Holdings's 1,693 CFPB complaints sit next to Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Filing geometry
Texas is the plurality state for CURO Intermediate Holdings (27.9%)
Volume rank #106 and composite rank #3,561 diverge by 3,455 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.
- Plurality state
- Texas 27.9%
- Mid-band (15–30%) · 45 states with ≥1 filing
- Seasonal peak
- 2025-12 8.4%
- 8–15% band · 38 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #106 volume
- #3,561 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,455 places worse than volume
How does CURO Intermediate Holdings compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 734 |
| Written notification about debt | 294 |
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 196 |
| False statements or representation | 161 |
| Communication tactics | 108 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 102 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 33 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 29 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 18 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 18 |
Where do complaints against CURO Intermediate Holdings come from?
CURO Intermediate Holdings's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against CURO Intermediate Holdings
Across 45 states with at least one filing
- Texas
Texas
472 complaints
- California
California
297 complaints
- Tennessee 87
Tennessee
87 complaints
- Louisiana 75
Louisiana
75 complaints
- Alabama 69
Alabama
69 complaints
- Ohio 64
Ohio
64 complaints
- Virginia 64
Virginia
64 complaints
- Missouri 61
Missouri
61 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for CURO Intermediate Holdings: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 1,693.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 99.94061757719716%.
Know your rights before responding to CURO Intermediate Holdings: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |