This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 973 complaints

AES/Pheaa - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 47 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about AES/Pheaa

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record aes-pheaa AES/Pheaa

Grade D · 973 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #159 · compose #3732

  • VOL 973
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 41
  • STATES 47
  • TIMELY 100%
  • DISPUTE 20%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #159
  • COMPOSE #3,732

Nearest volume peer: First Federal Credit Control, Inc. (974 complaints)

AES/Pheaa (this)973First Federal Credit Control…974Credit Protection Associatio…980Unifin Inc.988Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC990
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

AES/Pheaa's 973 CFPB complaints sit next to First Federal Credit Control, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

Distributed filing map

AES/Pheaa spreads filings across 47 states - Pennsylvania leads at only 9.7%

Despite a broad state map, AES/Pheaa still sits volume #159 against composite #3,732 - the two RankMaps diverge by 3,573 places. Corpus placement method.

Most-even geography
Lead state under 15%
Pennsylvania still leads at 9.7% across 47 states
Seasonal peak
2014-09 14.0%
8–15% band · 7 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#159 volume
#3,732 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,573 places worse than volume

How does AES/Pheaa compare to its peers?

How does AES/PHEAA compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
AES/PHEAA National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
41
157
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
100%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
20%
20%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2014-02 2021-12

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 267
Written notification about debt 161
False statements or representation 138
Communication tactics 118
Disclosure verification of debt 102
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 74
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 58
Improper contact or sharing of info 27
Taking/threatening an illegal action 17
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 11

Where do complaints against AES/Pheaa come from?

AES/Pheaa's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against AES/Pheaa

Across 47 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for AES/Pheaa: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to AES/Pheaa: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.