This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

2026 CFPB data Public-data reference. FDCPA reference 5 complaints

Sullivan & Terranova — Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 2 states. Updated as new federal complaint data lands in the upstream Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Sullivan & Terranova

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
F

Grade F · 51.6/100 composite

This collector has a failing complaint record with very high complaint volumes and poor response rates.

What do CFPB complaints reveal about Sullivan & Terranova?

Sullivan & Terranova has accumulated 5 total CFPB complaints across 2 states, with 0 filed in the most recent 12 months against 5 historical complaints before that window. The trailing-12-month volume represents 0.0% of the full complaint history, a stable pattern that indicates a mature dispute profile with predictable monthly volumes.

The dominant consumer grievance logged with the CFPB is "Taking/threatening an illegal action", narrowing to "Sued where didn't live/sign for debt", which aligns with FDCPA-regulated conduct and signals the operational area most likely to trigger regulator scrutiny. The company posts a 40% timely-response rate against a 40% consumer-dispute-after-response rate, a pairing that calibrates how well its complaint-resolution workflow holds up once a consumer pushes back.

Complaints have been recorded across 2 states, led by Oregon with 4 and Washington with 1, which matches a multi-state collection footprint rather than a regional operation. Normalized against the full CFPB collector database, the reputation score of 51.6/100 places Sullivan & Terranova in grade band F, a tier reached by blending complaint volume, response timeliness, dispute rates, and issue severity into a single comparable metric.

Complaint Summary

Total CFPB complaints

5

All-time across CCDB intake

Last 12 months

0

0.0% of total history

Stable →

States active

2

Distinct state filings

Timely response rate

40%

Within CFPB SLA window

Consumer disputes

40%

After company response

Reputation grade

F

51.6/100 composite

Response-quality profile

How Sullivan & Terranova performs on CFPB resolution-quality metrics versus a fleet average benchmark drawn from the full debt-collection vertical.

Timely response within SLA 40.0%
Vertical avg

CFPB requires companies to respond within 15 days for most complaints; 60 days for credit-reporting.

Consumer dispute rate (post-response) 80.0%
Vertical avg

Lower is better. The percentage of consumers who flagged the company's response as unsatisfactory.

State coverage breadth 3.6%

Share of US states + territories with at least one filed complaint against this collector.

How does Sullivan & Terranova compare to its peers?

How does Sullivan & Terranova compare? Versus a peer and the national average across 60+ high-volume collectors
Sullivan & Terranova National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
22,938
250
Timely-response ratehigher is better
40%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
40%
24%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. Complaints reflect consumer reports, not proven violations.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2015-04 2016-10

Top Consumer Issues

Taking/threatening an illegal action3 (%)
Communication tactics2 (%)

Most common issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action — Sued where didn't live/sign for debt

Know Your Rights

If this company is contacting you, you have rights under the FDCPA. They must stop contacting you if you send a written cease-communication request. You can also request written validation of the debt within 30 days.

Learn your full FDCPA rights →

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Sub-Issue Complaints
Taking/threatening an illegal action Sued where didn't live/sign for debt 2
Taking/threatening an illegal action Attempted to/Collected exempt funds 1
Communication tactics Frequent or repeated calls 1
Communication tactics Threatened to take legal action 1

Where do complaints against Sullivan & Terranova come from?

The states where consumers have filed the most CFPB complaints against Sullivan & Terranova. Every figure is the company's own complaint count in that state — not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Sullivan & Terranova

Across 2 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most common complaint against Sullivan & Terranova?

The most common issue consumers report about Sullivan & Terranova is "Taking/threatening an illegal action", specifically "Sued where didn't live/sign for debt". This is based on 5 complaints filed with the CFPB.

Are complaints against Sullivan & Terranova increasing or decreasing?

Complaints against Sullivan & Terranova have been stable. The company received 0 complaints in the last 12 months.

What is Sullivan & Terranova's reputation grade?

Sullivan & Terranova has a reputation grade of F (score: 51.6/100). This collector has a failing complaint record with very high complaint volumes and poor response rates.

Does Sullivan & Terranova respond to consumer complaints?

Sullivan & Terranova has a 40% timely response rate to CFPB complaints. Consumers disputed the company's response in 40% of cases.

In how many states does Sullivan & Terranova operate?

Sullivan & Terranova has received CFPB complaints from consumers in 2 states, with the most complaints from Oregon (4 complaints).

What can I do if Sullivan & Terranova is contacting me?

Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), you have the right to request written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. You can also send a cease-communication letter to stop calls. If Sullivan & Terranova violates the FDCPA, you may be able to sue for damages up to $1,000 plus attorney fees.

Consumer Guides

Primary source data

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial