This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 60 complaints

Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 12 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record kross-lieberman-stone-inc Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.

Grade F · 60 CFPB filings · 46% timely · lead issue: Disclosure verification of debt · vol #1086 · compose #4822

  • VOL 60
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 12
  • TIMELY 46%
  • DISPUTE 9%
  • ISSUE Disclosure verification of…
  • RANK #1,086
  • COMPOSE #4,822

Nearest volume peer: Account Managers, Inc. (60 complaints)

Account Managers, Inc.60Collection Bureau Services, …60Credit Karma, LLC60Mendelson Law Firm60Kross, Lieberman & Stone, In…60
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.'s 60 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Managers, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

51.7% of Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in North Carolina

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc. is volume #1,086 but composite #4,822, while North Carolina dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
North Carolina 51.7%
31 of 60 filings · 12 states touched
Seasonal peak
2021-06 10.3%
8–15% band · 4 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,086 volume
#4,822 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,736 places worse than volume

How does Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc. compare to its peers?

How does Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Kross, Lieberman & Sto… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
21
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
46%
91%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
9%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2020-06 2023-12

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Disclosure verification of debt 13
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 12
Communication tactics 8
False statements or representation 7
Attempts to collect debt not owed 6
Written notification about debt 6
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 4
Improper contact or sharing of info 3
Taking/threatening an illegal action 1

Where do complaints against Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc. come from?

Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.

Across 12 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Kross, Lieberman & Stone, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.