This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Investment Retrievers, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 21 states, reputation grade D.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Investment Retrievers, Inc.
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
46 complaints
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
41 complaints
- False statements or representation
False statements or representation
23 complaints
- Written notification about debt 18
Written notification about debt
18 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 14
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
14 complaints
- Communication tactics 12
Communication tactics
12 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record investment-retrievers-inc Investment Retrievers, Inc.
Grade D · 178 CFPB filings · 94% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #600 · compose #3740
- VOL 178
- GRADE D
- 12MO 35
- STATES 21
- TIMELY 94%
- DISPUTE 26%
- ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
- RANK #600
- COMPOSE #3,740
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Fresno Credit Bureau (178 complaints)
Investment Retrievers, Inc.'s 178 CFPB complaints sit next to Fresno Credit Bureau on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
State-heavy filing map
39.3% of Investment Retrievers, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in California
High volume does not equal a clean composite: Investment Retrievers, Inc. is volume #600 but composite #3,740, while California dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.
- Dominant state
- California 39.3%
- 70 of 178 filings · 21 states touched
- Seasonal peak
- 2026-02 12.2%
- 8–15% band · 11 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #600 volume
- #3,740 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,140 places worse than volume
How does Investment Retrievers, Inc. compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 46 |
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 41 |
| False statements or representation | 23 |
| Written notification about debt | 18 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 14 |
| Communication tactics | 12 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 9 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 5 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 5 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 4 |
Where do complaints against Investment Retrievers, Inc. come from?
Investment Retrievers, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Investment Retrievers, Inc.
Across 21 states with at least one filing
- California
California
70 complaints
- Texas
Texas
49 complaints
- Florida 14
Florida
14 complaints
- Louisiana 7
Louisiana
7 complaints
- Georgia 6
Georgia
6 complaints
- Nevada 6
Nevada
6 complaints
- Illinois 3
Illinois
3 complaints
- New York 3
New York
3 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Investment Retrievers, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 178.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 93.90243902439023%.
Know your rights before responding to Investment Retrievers, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |