This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 10 states, reputation grade D.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC
- Disclosure verification of debt
Disclosure verification of debt
32 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
21 complaints
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
Taking/threatening an illegal action
13 complaints
- Communication tactics 12
Communication tactics
12 complaints
- False statements or representation 11
False statements or representation
11 complaints
- Improper contact or sharing of info 7
Improper contact or sharing of info
7 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record blatt-hasenmiller-leibsker-moore-llc Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC
Grade D · 100 CFPB filings · 98% timely · lead issue: Disclosure verification of debt · vol #814 · compose #3316
- VOL 100
- GRADE D
- 12MO 0
- STATES 10
- TIMELY 98%
- DISPUTE 26%
- ISSUE Disclosure verification of…
- RANK #814
- COMPOSE #3,316
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Nathan & Nathan, P.C. (100 complaints)
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC's 100 CFPB complaints sit next to Nathan & Nathan, P.C. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
State-heavy filing map
42.0% of Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC's CFPB filings land in Illinois
High volume does not equal a clean composite: Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC is volume #814 but composite #3,316, while Illinois dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.
- Dominant state
- Illinois 42.0%
- 42 of 100 filings · 10 states touched
- Seasonal peak
- 2024-12 10.2%
- 8–15% band · 6 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #814 volume
- #3,316 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,502 places worse than volume
How does Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Disclosure verification of debt | 32 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 21 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 13 |
| Communication tactics | 12 |
| False statements or representation | 11 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 7 |
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 4 |
Where do complaints against Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC come from?
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC
Across 10 states with at least one filing
- Illinois
Illinois
42 complaints
- Indiana
Indiana
26 complaints
- Arizona 16
Arizona
16 complaints
- Pennsylvania 7
Pennsylvania
7 complaints
- Michigan 4
Michigan
4 complaints
- Delaware 1
Delaware
1 complaints
- Nevada 1
Nevada
1 complaints
- New Jersey 1
New Jersey
1 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 100.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 98%.
Know your rights before responding to Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |