This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 581 complaints

Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 40 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record asset-management-outsourcing-inc Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.

Grade D · 581 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #241 · compose #3998

  • VOL 581
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 40
  • TIMELY 100%
  • DISPUTE 29%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #241
  • COMPOSE #3,998

Nearest volume peer: Crown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch (581 complaints)

Onemain Financial Holdings, …576Crown Asset Management, LLC,…581Asset Management Outsourcing…581Opportunity Financial, LLC588Optimum Outcomes, Inc.591
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.'s 581 CFPB complaints sit next to Crown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

35.3% of Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in Georgia

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. is volume #241 but composite #3,998, while Georgia dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Georgia 35.3%
205 of 581 filings · 40 states touched
Seasonal peak
2026-01 8.6%
8–15% band · 85 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#241 volume
#3,998 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,757 places worse than volume

How does Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. compare to its peers?

How does Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Asset Management Outso… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
152
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
100%
99%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
29%
28%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2024-04 2026-03

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 175
Written notification about debt 146
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 101
Disclosure verification of debt 51
Communication tactics 39
False statements or representation 33
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 27
Improper contact or sharing of info 6
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 2
Taking/threatening an illegal action 1

Where do complaints against Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. come from?

Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.

Across 40 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.