This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Optimum Outcomes, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 34 states, reputation grade F.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Optimum Outcomes, Inc.
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
150 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
140 complaints
- Written notification about debt
Written notification about debt
94 complaints
- Disclosure verification of debt
Disclosure verification of debt
82 complaints
- Communication tactics
Communication tactics
70 complaints
- False statements or representation 23
False statements or representation
23 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record optimum-outcomes-inc Optimum Outcomes, Inc.
Grade F · 591 CFPB filings · 88% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #239 · compose #4251
- VOL 591
- GRADE F
- 12MO 5
- STATES 34
- TIMELY 88%
- DISPUTE 22%
- ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
- RANK #239
- COMPOSE #4,251
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Fiserv Finxact Core (593 complaints)
Optimum Outcomes, Inc.'s 591 CFPB complaints sit next to Fiserv Finxact Core on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
State-heavy filing map
38.4% of Optimum Outcomes, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in North Carolina
High volume does not equal a clean composite: Optimum Outcomes, Inc. is volume #239 but composite #4,251, while North Carolina dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.
- Dominant state
- North Carolina 38.4%
- 227 of 591 filings · 34 states touched
- Seasonal peak
- 2026-02 11.1%
- 8–15% band · 6 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #239 volume
- #4,251 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 4,012 places worse than volume
How does Optimum Outcomes, Inc. compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 150 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 140 |
| Written notification about debt | 94 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 82 |
| Communication tactics | 70 |
| False statements or representation | 23 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 14 |
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 10 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 5 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 3 |
Where do complaints against Optimum Outcomes, Inc. come from?
Optimum Outcomes, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Optimum Outcomes, Inc.
Across 34 states with at least one filing
- North Carolina
North Carolina
227 complaints
- Georgia
Georgia
106 complaints
- Florida 74
Florida
74 complaints
- Texas 34
Texas
34 complaints
- Wisconsin 33
Wisconsin
33 complaints
- California 12
California
12 complaints
- Louisiana 10
Louisiana
10 complaints
- South Carolina 10
South Carolina
10 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Optimum Outcomes, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 591.
Similar timely response rate
Nearest collectors by CFPB 15-day timely-response %. This record: 88.07495741056218%.
Know your rights before responding to Optimum Outcomes, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |