This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 64 complaints

Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 7 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record works-lentz-of-tulsa-inc Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.

Grade C · 64 CFPB filings · 98% timely · lead issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed · vol #1052 · compose #2659

  • VOL 64
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 3
  • STATES 7
  • TIMELY 98%
  • DISPUTE 21%
  • ISSUE Cont'd attempts collect de…
  • RANK #1,052
  • COMPOSE #2,659

Nearest volume peer: Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc. (64 complaints)

Dynamic Recovery Services, I…64Global Asset Management Grou…64RAB, Inc.64Rickart Collection Systems, …64Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.…64
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.'s 64 CFPB complaints sit next to Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

87.5% of Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in Oklahoma

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc. is volume #1,052 but composite #2,659, while Oklahoma dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Oklahoma 87.5%
56 of 64 filings · 7 states touched
Spike month
2014-12 42.9%
3 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,052 volume
#2,659 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 1,607 places worse than volume

How does Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc. compare to its peers?

How does Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Works & Lentz of Tulsa… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
3
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
98%
70%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
21%
6%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2014-09 2015-05

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 15
False statements or representation 11
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 9
Attempts to collect debt not owed 8
Written notification about debt 7
Communication tactics 6
Disclosure verification of debt 6
Taking/threatening an illegal action 2

Where do complaints against Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc. come from?

Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.

Across 7 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Works & Lentz of Tulsa, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.