This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 35 complaints

United Auto Acceptance - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 7 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about United Auto Acceptance

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record united-auto-acceptance United Auto Acceptance

Grade F · 35 CFPB filings · 69% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #1436 · compose #4807

  • VOL 35
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 10
  • STATES 7
  • TIMELY 69%
  • DISPUTE 50%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #1,436
  • COMPOSE #4,807

Nearest volume peer: Accounts Receivable Inc. (35 complaints)

Accounts Receivable Inc.35American Credit Resolution, …35CAB Receivables, Inc.35Comerica35United Auto Acceptance (this)35
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

United Auto Acceptance's 35 CFPB complaints sit next to Accounts Receivable Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

77.1% of United Auto Acceptance's CFPB filings land in Georgia

High volume does not equal a clean composite: United Auto Acceptance is volume #1,436 but composite #4,807, while Georgia dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Georgia 77.1%
27 of 35 filings · 7 states touched
Seasonal peak
2017-05 8.7%
8–15% band · 2 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,436 volume
#4,807 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,371 places worse than volume

How does United Auto Acceptance compare to its peers?

How does UNITED AUTO ACCEPTANCE compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
UNITED AUTO ACCEPTANCE National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
10
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
69%
51%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
50%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2016-01 2021-07

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 11
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 11
Written notification about debt 6
Communication tactics 3
False statements or representation 2
Disclosure verification of debt 1
Improper contact or sharing of info 1

Where do complaints against United Auto Acceptance come from?

United Auto Acceptance's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against United Auto Acceptance

Across 7 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for United Auto Acceptance: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to United Auto Acceptance: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.