This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 2 complaints

Royalty Management Corporation - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 2 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Royalty Management Corporation

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
Subscribe to complaint changes (RSS)

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record royalty-management-corporation Royalty Management Corporation

Grade C · 2 CFPB filings · 50% timely · lead issue: Written notification about debt

  • VOL 2
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 1
  • STATES 2
  • TIMELY 50%
  • ISSUE Written notification about…
  • RANK #4,311
  • COMPOSE Not ranked

Nearest volume peer: 1 Auto Finance, Inc. (2 complaints)

1 Auto Finance, Inc.1 Auto Finance, Inc.21st Alliance Lending, LLC1st Alliance Lending, LLC21st Capital Finance of South Carolina, Inc.1st Capital Finance of South…21st Preference Mortgage Corp1st Preference Mortgage Corp2Royalty Management Corporation (this)Royalty Management Corporati…2
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Royalty Management Corporation's 2 CFPB complaints sit next to 1 Auto Finance, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

How the 2 complaints break down

Every complaint issue type on record for Royalty Management Corporation, not just the top ones shown above.

Reputation score breakdown

C
Composite reputation score
57.6/100
Royalty Management Corporation

Blends complaint volume, timely-response rate, dispute rate, and recent trend from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database into one comparable 0-100 score. Not an official CFPB rating and not a finding of wrongdoing — see methodology for the exact formula.

Complaint volume A
2
Fewer complaints relative to graded peers scores higher; volume reflects footprint as much as conduct.
Timely response C
50%
Share of complaints answered inside the CFPB’s 15-day window.
Dispute rate N/A
N/A
No dispute rate reported.
Recent trend D
Rising
Whether the last 12 months of complaints are rising, stable, or falling vs the prior period.

State-heavy filing map

50.0% of Royalty Management Corporation's CFPB filings land in North Carolina

Concentration is computed from this collector's company_states rows only, not a national baseline. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
North Carolina 50.0%
1 of 2 filings · 2 states touched
Spike month
2026-01 40.0%
2 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Corpus ranks
#4,311 volume
Composite not ranked (fewer than 200 complaints)
Volume rank among 5,420 collectors

How does Royalty Management Corporation compare to its peers?

How does Royalty Management Corporation compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Royalty Management Corporation National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
1
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
50%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
0%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Royalty Management Corporation's complaint volume in context

Royalty Management Corporation vs all collectors by complaint volume

Where this collector's total CFPB complaint count sits among every tracked debt collector (volume, not a quality ranking)

2 Bottom 20% higher than 20% of 5,420 collectors

0–20: 3,504 collectors (65%). This entry sits in this band. 20–40: 565 collectors (10%). Above this entry. 40–60: 260 collectors (5%). Above this entry. 60–80: 163 collectors (3%). Above this entry. 80–100: 112 collectors (2%). Above this entry. 100–120: 63 collectors (1%). Above this entry. 120–140: 67 collectors (1%). Above this entry. 140–160: 53 collectors (1%). Above this entry. 160–180: 42 collectors (1%). Above this entry. 180–200: 55 collectors (1%). Above this entry. 200–220: 536 collectors (10%). Above this entry. Royalty Management Corporation 0 220 tracked debt collectors, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more collectors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database · September 2026

Complaint Trend (24 months)

Rising ↑
2017-03 2026-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Written notification about debt
1
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly
1

Where do complaints against Royalty Management Corporation come from?

Royalty Management Corporation's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Royalty Management Corporation

Across 2 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Royalty Management Corporation: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Royalty Management Corporation: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.