This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 85 complaints

NAM National Arbitration and Mediation - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 35 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about NAM National Arbitration and Mediation

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record nam-national-arbitration-and-mediation NAM National Arbitration and Mediation

Grade F · 85 CFPB filings · 8% timely · lead issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action · vol #899 · compose #5216

  • VOL 85
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 2
  • STATES 35
  • TIMELY 8%
  • DISPUTE 3%
  • ISSUE Took or threatened to take…
  • RANK #899
  • COMPOSE #5,216

Nearest volume peer: Account Services Collections, Inc (85 complaints)

Account Services Collections…85Ballybunion Enterprises, Inc85CB1, Inc.85Credit Bureau of Carbon Coun…85NAM National Arbitration and…85
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

NAM National Arbitration and Mediation's 85 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Services Collections, Inc on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

Filing geometry

Texas is the plurality state for NAM National Arbitration and Mediation (23.5%)

Volume rank #899 and composite rank #5,216 diverge by 4,317 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.

Plurality state
Texas 23.5%
Mid-band (15–30%) · 35 states with ≥1 filing
Seasonal peak
2025-04 8.6%
8–15% band · 3 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#899 volume
#5,216 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 4,317 places worse than volume

How does NAM National Arbitration and Mediation compare to its peers?

How does NAM National Arbitration and Mediation compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
NAM National Arbitrati… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
2
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
8%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
3%
28%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2014-10 2026-03

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 24
Attempts to collect debt not owed 16
Taking/threatening an illegal action 12
Communication tactics 9
False statements or representation 7
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 6
Written notification about debt 3
Disclosure verification of debt 3
Improper contact or sharing of info 3
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 2

Where do complaints against NAM National Arbitration and Mediation come from?

NAM National Arbitration and Mediation's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against NAM National Arbitration and Mediation

Across 35 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for NAM National Arbitration and Mediation: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to NAM National Arbitration and Mediation: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.