This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
NAM National Arbitration and Mediation - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 35 states, reputation grade F.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about NAM National Arbitration and Mediation
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
24 complaints
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
16 complaints
- Taking/threatening an illegal action
Taking/threatening an illegal action
12 complaints
- Communication tactics 9
Communication tactics
9 complaints
- False statements or representation 7
False statements or representation
7 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 6
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
6 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record nam-national-arbitration-and-mediation NAM National Arbitration and Mediation
Grade F · 85 CFPB filings · 8% timely · lead issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action · vol #899 · compose #5216
- VOL 85
- GRADE F
- 12MO 2
- STATES 35
- TIMELY 8%
- DISPUTE 3%
- ISSUE Took or threatened to take…
- RANK #899
- COMPOSE #5,216
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Account Services Collections, Inc (85 complaints)
NAM National Arbitration and Mediation's 85 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Services Collections, Inc on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Filing geometry
Texas is the plurality state for NAM National Arbitration and Mediation (23.5%)
Volume rank #899 and composite rank #5,216 diverge by 4,317 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.
- Plurality state
- Texas 23.5%
- Mid-band (15–30%) · 35 states with ≥1 filing
- Seasonal peak
- 2025-04 8.6%
- 8–15% band · 3 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #899 volume
- #5,216 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 4,317 places worse than volume
How does NAM National Arbitration and Mediation compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 24 |
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 16 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 12 |
| Communication tactics | 9 |
| False statements or representation | 7 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 6 |
| Written notification about debt | 3 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 3 |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 3 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 2 |
Where do complaints against NAM National Arbitration and Mediation come from?
NAM National Arbitration and Mediation's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against NAM National Arbitration and Mediation
Across 35 states with at least one filing
- Texas
Texas
20 complaints
- Arizona 5
Arizona
5 complaints
- California 5
California
5 complaints
- Ohio 5
Ohio
5 complaints
- Colorado 4
Colorado
4 complaints
- New York 4
New York
4 complaints
- Georgia 3
Georgia
3 complaints
- Louisiana 3
Louisiana
3 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for NAM National Arbitration and Mediation: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 85.
Know your rights before responding to NAM National Arbitration and Mediation: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |