This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 32 states, reputation grade C.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
20 complaints
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
16 complaints
- Communication tactics
Communication tactics
16 complaints
- Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
12 complaints
- False statements or representation 5
False statements or representation
5 complaints
- Disclosure verification of debt 5
Disclosure verification of debt
5 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record miller-stark-klein-and-associates Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates
Grade C · 85 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action · vol #898 · compose #3142
- VOL 85
- GRADE C
- 12MO 0
- STATES 32
- TIMELY 100%
- DISPUTE 28%
- ISSUE Took or threatened to take…
- RANK #898
- COMPOSE #3,142
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Account Services Collections, Inc (85 complaints)
Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates's 85 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Services Collections, Inc on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Distributed filing map
Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates spreads filings across 32 states - Georgia leads at only 10.6%
Despite a broad state map, Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates still sits volume #898 against composite #3,142 - the two RankMaps diverge by 2,244 places. Corpus placement method.
- Most-even geography
- Lead state under 15%
- Georgia still leads at 10.6% across 32 states
- Seasonal peak
- 2025-09 12.5%
- 8–15% band · 4 filings
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #898 volume
- #3,142 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,244 places worse than volume
How does Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 20 |
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 16 |
| Communication tactics | 16 |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 12 |
| False statements or representation | 5 |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 5 |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 5 |
| Written notification about debt | 3 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 3 |
Where do complaints against Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates come from?
Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates
Across 32 states with at least one filing
- Georgia
Georgia
9 complaints
- California
California
8 complaints
- Texas
Texas
8 complaints
- New York
New York
7 complaints
- Florida
Florida
6 complaints
- Ohio
Ohio
6 complaints
- Arizona
Arizona
5 complaints
- Michigan
Michigan
5 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 85.
Know your rights before responding to Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |