This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 85 complaints

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 32 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record miller-stark-klein-and-associates Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates

Grade C · 85 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action · vol #898 · compose #3142

  • VOL 85
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 32
  • TIMELY 100%
  • DISPUTE 28%
  • ISSUE Took or threatened to take…
  • RANK #898
  • COMPOSE #3,142

Nearest volume peer: Account Services Collections, Inc (85 complaints)

Account Services Collections…85Ballybunion Enterprises, Inc85CB1, Inc.85Credit Bureau of Carbon Coun…85Miller, Stark, Klein and Ass…85
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates's 85 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Services Collections, Inc on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

Distributed filing map

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates spreads filings across 32 states - Georgia leads at only 10.6%

Despite a broad state map, Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates still sits volume #898 against composite #3,142 - the two RankMaps diverge by 2,244 places. Corpus placement method.

Most-even geography
Lead state under 15%
Georgia still leads at 10.6% across 32 states
Seasonal peak
2025-09 12.5%
8–15% band · 4 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#898 volume
#3,142 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,244 places worse than volume

How does Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates compare to its peers?

How does Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Miller, Stark, Klein a… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
100%
91%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
28%
21%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2019-11 2025-12

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 20
Attempts to collect debt not owed 16
Communication tactics 16
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 12
False statements or representation 5
Disclosure verification of debt 5
Taking/threatening an illegal action 5
Written notification about debt 3
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 3

Where do complaints against Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates come from?

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates

Across 32 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.