This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 32 complaints

Lionstone Holdings Group - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 15 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Lionstone Holdings Group

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record lionstone-holdings-group Lionstone Holdings Group

Grade F · 32 CFPB filings · 66% timely · lead issue: Communication tactics · vol #1498 · compose #4268

  • VOL 32
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 15
  • TIMELY 66%
  • DISPUTE 26%
  • ISSUE Communication tactics
  • RANK #1,498
  • COMPOSE #4,268

Nearest volume peer: ADR ARBITRATION SERVICES (Closed) (32 complaints)

ADR ARBITRATION SERVICES (Cl…32Capital Recovery Systems, In…32Cash Express, LLC32Christus Health32Lionstone Holdings Group (th…32
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Lionstone Holdings Group's 32 CFPB complaints sit next to ADR ARBITRATION SERVICES (Closed) on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

Filing geometry

Texas is the plurality state for Lionstone Holdings Group (21.9%)

Volume rank #1,498 and composite rank #4,268 diverge by 2,770 places on PlainCollector's CFPB-derived corpus maps. Corpus placement method.

Plurality state
Texas 21.9%
Mid-band (15–30%) · 15 states with ≥1 filing
Seasonal peak
2022-01 10.9%
8–15% band · 5 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,498 volume
#4,268 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,770 places worse than volume

How does Lionstone Holdings Group compare to its peers?

How does Lionstone Holdings Group compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Lionstone Holdings Gro… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
4
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
66%
97%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
26%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2021-03 2023-10

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Communication tactics 11
Taking/threatening an illegal action 7
Disclosure verification of debt 5
False statements or representation 3
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 3
Improper contact or sharing of info 2
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 1

Where do complaints against Lionstone Holdings Group come from?

Lionstone Holdings Group's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Lionstone Holdings Group

Across 15 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Lionstone Holdings Group: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Lionstone Holdings Group: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.