This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade B 2 complaints

Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 1 states, reputation grade B.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record latham-wagner-steele-lehman-pc Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.

Grade B · 2 CFPB filings · 50% timely · lead issue: Disclosure verification of debt · vol #4165 · compose #1377

  • VOL 2
  • GRADE B
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 1
  • TIMELY 50%
  • DISPUTE 0%
  • ISSUE Disclosure verification of…
  • RANK #4,165
  • COMPOSE #1,377

Nearest volume peer: 1 Auto Finance, Inc. (2 complaints)

1 Auto Finance, Inc.21st Alliance Lending, LLC21st Capital Finance of South…21st Preference Mortgage Corp2Latham, Wagner, Steele & Leh…2
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.'s 2 CFPB complaints sit next to 1 Auto Finance, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

100.0% of Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.'s CFPB filings land in Oklahoma

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C. is volume #4,165 but composite #1,377, while Oklahoma dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Oklahoma 100.0%
2 of 2 filings · 1 states touched
Spike month
2025-10 100.0%
1 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#4,165 volume
#1,377 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 2,788 places better than volume

How does Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C. compare to its peers?

How does Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Latham, Wagner, Steele… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
50%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
0%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2025-10 2025-10

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Disclosure verification of debt 1
Improper contact or sharing of info 1

Where do complaints against Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C. come from?

Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.

Across 1 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Latham, Wagner, Steele & Lehman, P.C.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.