This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 4 complaints

Escrow and Title Services, Inc. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 2 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Escrow and Title Services, Inc.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record escrow-and-title-services-inc Escrow and Title Services, Inc.

Grade F · 4 CFPB filings · 0% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #3359 · compose #5151

  • VOL 4
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 1
  • STATES 2
  • TIMELY 0%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #3,359
  • COMPOSE #5,151

Nearest volume peer: 90 Day Credit Experts (4 complaints)

90 Day Credit Experts4A & A North American Financi…4A & S Collection Associates,…4Accelerated Receivables Mana…4Escrow and Title Services, I…4
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Escrow and Title Services, Inc.'s 4 CFPB complaints sit next to 90 Day Credit Experts on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

50.0% of Escrow and Title Services, Inc.'s CFPB filings land in Illinois

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Escrow and Title Services, Inc. is volume #3,359 but composite #5,151, while Illinois dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Illinois 50.0%
2 of 4 filings · 2 states touched
Spike month
2024-12 42.9%
3 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#3,359 volume
#5,151 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 1,792 places worse than volume

How does Escrow and Title Services, Inc. compare to its peers?

How does Escrow and Title Services, Inc. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Escrow and Title Servi… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
1
1
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
0%
50%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
0%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2016-09 2026-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 2
False statements or representation 2

Where do complaints against Escrow and Title Services, Inc. come from?

Escrow and Title Services, Inc.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Escrow and Title Services, Inc.

Across 2 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Escrow and Title Services, Inc.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Escrow and Title Services, Inc.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.