This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 2 complaints

David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C. - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 1 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record david-n-hull-attorney-at-law-pc David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.

Grade C · 2 CFPB filings · 50% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #4021 · compose #3016

  • VOL 2
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 1
  • TIMELY 50%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #4,021
  • COMPOSE #3,016

Nearest volume peer: 1 Auto Finance, Inc. (2 complaints)

1 Auto Finance, Inc.21st Alliance Lending, LLC21st Capital Finance of South…21st Preference Mortgage Corp2David N. Hull Attorney at La…2
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.'s 2 CFPB complaints sit next to 1 Auto Finance, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

100.0% of David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.'s CFPB filings land in Montana

High volume does not equal a clean composite: David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C. is volume #4,021 but composite #3,016, while Montana dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Montana 100.0%
2 of 2 filings · 1 states touched
Spike month
2015-03 25.0%
1 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#4,021 volume
#3,016 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 1,005 places better than volume

How does David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C. compare to its peers?

How does David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C. compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
David N. Hull Attorney… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
50%
0%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
0%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2015-03 2016-10

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 1
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 1

Where do complaints against David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C. come from?

David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.'s own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.

Across 1 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to David N. Hull Attorney at Law P.C.: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.