This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 17 complaints

Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 1 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record clay-chapman-iwamura-pulice-nervell Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell

Grade C · 17 CFPB filings · 71% timely · lead issue: Disclosure verification of debt · vol #2021 · compose #2496

  • VOL 17
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 1
  • TIMELY 71%
  • DISPUTE 6%
  • ISSUE Disclosure verification of…
  • RANK #2,021
  • COMPOSE #2,496

Nearest volume peer: A/R Concepts, Inc. (17 complaints)

A/R Concepts, Inc.17Academy Mortgage Corporation17Accelerated Creditors Servic…17Accelerated Portfolio, Inc.17Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice …17
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell's 17 CFPB complaints sit next to A/R Concepts, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

100.0% of Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell's CFPB filings land in Hawaii

Concentration is computed from this collector's company_states rows only, not a national baseline. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Hawaii 100.0%
17 of 17 filings · 1 states touched
Even monthly load
Peak under 8%
Highest month 2015-03 at 5.9% (1 filings)
Corpus ranks
#2,021 volume
#2,496 composite
Among 5,420 volume-ranked / 5,278 scored collectors

How does Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell compare to its peers?

How does Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Clay Chapman Iwamura P… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
71%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
6%
0%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2015-03 2025-12

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Disclosure verification of debt 12
Taking/threatening an illegal action 3
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 2

Where do complaints against Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell come from?

Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell

Across 1 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.