This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright - Debt Collector Complaint Profile
CFPB complaint profile across 11 states, reputation grade D.
Complaints by issue type
What consumers report about Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright
- Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
6 complaints
- Attempts to collect debt not owed
Attempts to collect debt not owed
4 complaints
- Written notification about debt
Written notification about debt
3 complaints
- Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly
3 complaints
- False statements or representation 2
False statements or representation
2 complaints
- Communication tactics 2
Communication tactics
2 complaints
Data updated September 2026
CFPB complaint disposition
CCDB record capital-asset-recovery-inc-dba-jacobson-and-wright Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright
Grade D · 20 CFPB filings · 95% timely · lead issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action · vol #1885 · compose #3233
- VOL 20
- GRADE D
- 12MO 3
- STATES 11
- TIMELY 95%
- ISSUE Took or threatened to take…
- RANK #1,885
- COMPOSE #3,233
Volume peers
Nearest volume peer: Account Control Systems, Inc (20 complaints)
Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright's 20 CFPB complaints sit next to Account Control Systems, Inc on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →
Spiky monthly series
California is the plurality state for Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright (15.0%)
The 2023-08 spike coincides with a 1,348-place gap between volume rank #1,885 and composite #3,233. Corpus placement method.
- Plurality state
- California 15.0%
- Mid-band (15–30%) · 11 states with ≥1 filing
- Spike month
- 2023-08 33.3%
- 1 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
- Divergent corpus ranks
- #1,885 volume
- #3,233 composite
- Cleanest-composite ladder is 1,348 places worse than volume
How does Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright compare to its peers?
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.
Complaint Trend (24 months)
Issue Detail Breakdown
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | 6 |
| Attempts to collect debt not owed | 4 |
| Written notification about debt | 3 |
| Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly | 3 |
| False statements or representation | 2 |
| Communication tactics | 2 |
Where do complaints against Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright come from?
Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright's own per-state count, not a national baseline.
Top states by complaints against Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright
Across 11 states with at least one filing
- California
California
3 complaints
- Georgia
Georgia
3 complaints
- Texas
Texas
3 complaints
- Virginia
Virginia
3 complaints
- Ohio
Ohio
2 complaints
- Arizona 1
Arizona
1 complaints
- Florida 1
Florida
1 complaints
- Michigan 1
Michigan
1 complaints
Compare beyond geography
Nationwide peers by volume & timely response
Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.
Similar filing volume
Nearest collectors by total CFPB complaints. This record: 20.
Know your rights before responding to Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.
According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |