This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade F 139 complaints

Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 20 states, reputation grade F.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record overton-russell-doerr-and-donovan-llp Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP

Grade F · 139 CFPB filings · 87% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #689 · compose #4340

  • VOL 139
  • GRADE F
  • 12MO 4
  • STATES 20
  • TIMELY 87%
  • DISPUTE 36%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #689
  • COMPOSE #4,340

Nearest volume peer: Merchants Credit Corporation (139 complaints)

Merchants Credit Corporation139Nations Recovery Center139Universal Recovery Corporati…139Vengroff Williams, Inc139Overton, Russell, Doerr and …139
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP's 139 CFPB complaints sit next to Merchants Credit Corporation on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

77.0% of Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP's CFPB filings land in New York

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP is volume #689 but composite #4,340, while New York dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
New York 77.0%
107 of 139 filings · 20 states touched
Seasonal peak
2021-07 10.3%
8–15% band · 3 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#689 volume
#4,340 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,651 places worse than volume

How does Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP compare to its peers?

How does Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Overton, Russell, Doer… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
4
0
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
87%
87%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
36%
21%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2018-03 2026-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 31
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 28
Written notification about debt 24
False statements or representation 18
Disclosure verification of debt 16
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 11
Communication tactics 7
Improper contact or sharing of info 2
Taking/threatening an illegal action 2

Where do complaints against Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP come from?

Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP

Across 20 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Overton, Russell, Doerr and Donovan, LLP: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.