This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade C 21 complaints

Bleier & Cox APC - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 2 states, reputation grade C.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Bleier & Cox APC

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record bleier-cox-apc Bleier & Cox APC

Grade C · 21 CFPB filings · 100% timely · lead issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action · vol #1840 · compose #2442

  • VOL 21
  • GRADE C
  • 12MO 0
  • STATES 2
  • TIMELY 100%
  • DISPUTE 40%
  • ISSUE Taking/threatening an ille…
  • RANK #1,840
  • COMPOSE #2,442

Nearest volume peer: A & E Futures LLC (21 complaints)

A & E Futures LLC21Altitude Community Law P.C.21AR Solutions Inc21Arete Financial Group21Bleier & Cox APC (this)21
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Bleier & Cox APC's 21 CFPB complaints sit next to A & E Futures LLC on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

95.2% of Bleier & Cox APC's CFPB filings land in California

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Bleier & Cox APC is volume #1,840 but composite #2,442, while California dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
California 95.2%
20 of 21 filings · 2 states touched
Seasonal peak
2015-06 14.3%
8–15% band · 1 filings
Divergent corpus ranks
#1,840 volume
#2,442 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 602 places worse than volume

How does Bleier & Cox APC compare to its peers?

How does Bleier & Cox APC compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Bleier & Cox APC National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
0
5
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
100%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
40%
11%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2015-06 2019-03

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Taking/threatening an illegal action 5
False statements or representation 4
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 4
Attempts to collect debt not owed 3
Disclosure verification of debt 2
Written notification about debt 1
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 1
Improper contact or sharing of info 1

Where do complaints against Bleier & Cox APC come from?

Bleier & Cox APC's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Bleier & Cox APC

Across 2 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Bleier & Cox APC: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Bleier & Cox APC: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.